In contemporary debates on cultural appropriation, the boundary between homage and exploitation is notoriously porous. While critics decry the commodification of marginalised aesthetics, proponents argue that cultural hybridity fuels artistic ingenuity.
Yet this dialectic often overlooks the asymmetry of power — an omission that, according to sociologist Maya Fernández, forecloses any equitable resolution. Fernández posits that the yardstick for ethical borrowing should hinge not on intent but on impact, urging creators to account for both the material and symbolic capital garnered from their adaptations.
Her essay further interrogates the neoliberal premise that the market will organically reward authenticity; she counters that, in practice, gatekeepers frequently valorise palatable pastiche over genuine dissent.
Ultimately, the author advocates a paradigm in which collaborative authorship supplants unilateral appropriation, thereby recalibrating the distribution of cultural dividends.